Friday, 17 September 2021 00:28

Galaxis CEO Talks Twitch Account Bans and Possible Copyright Strike Solutions

Written by Hank Whitson
Rate this item
(0 votes)
Game Rant talks to CEO Max Gallardo about forthcoming Twitch competitor Galaxis' automated copyright content system and channel-banning policies.

The streaming industry continues to draw more creators and viewers with no foreseeable end in sight, but the business model is going through its share of growing pains. Copyright strikes and content-related bans have stirred up controversy on Twitch and YouTube, but a forthcoming competitor named Galaxis claims to feature systems that may help alleviate those issues. While there's no magic bullet for every streaming woe, if Galaxis delivers on its premise then Twitch could have a serious competition.

The platform, projected to launch in early 2022 pending investor backing, promises to streamline and simplify the corporate sponsorship process for content creators, but it also aims to solve the quagmire of bulk copyright strikes and channel bans. Game Rant spoke with Galaxis' CEO Max Gallardo about the platform's potential solutions to copyright violations, and how its system would penalize content violations.

RELATED: Twitch is Changing Its Refund Policy

Automated Copyright Licensing

Streams pose a daunting challenge to copyright holders whose material may be used without consent, but the current "solution" to the problem is inelegant at best. In the current model, rights holders issue DMCA or other cease-and-desist notices to Twitch and YouTube in broad swathes, resulting in bulk takedowns of content. As a result, streamers must painstakingly alter and reupload videos, often with little information regarding what content triggered the strike. Gallardo seeks to ease the problem by making it easier for creators to form contract with rights holders.

"By using our technologies, people that own the copyright can get a portion of the profits automatically. Which means that if you don’t earn any money, you don’t have to worry, and neither does the person who owns the copyright."

Few streamers can sample the music or other media they want due to a somewhat archaic licensing paradigm. The legal framework for licensing music and other copyrighted media was built around securing licenses for film and television. The costs associated with those legacy media is prohibitive for most streamers, however, and the process for securing rights is both lengthy and occlusive. As a result, streamers like Asmongold are calling for overhauls to copyright law.

Making it easy for creators to select from a catalogue of popular media could go a long way to combat the problem. A new model of licensing, embedded within a streaming platform, could allow copyright holders and streamers to profit simultaneously, without fear of bulk takedowns. Admittedly, there is nothing to stop streamers from ignoring Galaxis' media menu in favor of self-selected copyrighted material, but even then the platform presents a potential solution. According to Gallardo, rights holders can either block the content until the contested media is edited out of the video, or they can initiate a license negotiation with the channel holder.

Prioritizing Penalties Over Bans

Another frequent source of controversy in the streaming industry is account bans. After repeated content infractions, streamers are eventually barred from the platform. It's a common sense solution in theory, but determining what content crosses the line is a highly subjective endeavor. Such measures also typically offend fans of the banned streamer. Consequently, Gallardo believes that comprehensive bans are a bad move for streaming companies.

"I think that anybody who makes a mistake can correct it. I think banning a channel is a mistake. As a corporation you make people very mad at you. It’s kind of like if a child makes a mistake and you say ‘F*** you, child! I’m not going to be your parent anymore.'"

Galaxis' solution is to penalize channels that break the rules by limiting audiences' abilities to interact with the channel based on a rating system. If a channel gets a negative enough rating, it will eventually disappear from the automated sponsorship listing entirely, but creators will have ample time to notice something is amiss before it comes to such a drastic measure.

RELATED: Dr Disrespect Found Out Why Twitch Banned His Channel

Truly egregious content can earn channels a year-long ban on Galaxis, but only after a creator fails a three-strikes system similar to YouTube and Twitch's current copyright policy for permanent account bans. This seems like a creator-friendly move, though it remains to be seen if a community rating system can adequately censor objectionable content.

Content Controversies

Another common sticking point in the streaming industry is risque content. Hot tub streams, and certain ASMR streams are notorious for getting content creators in hot regulatory waters. On Galaxis, such infractions will be handled by users submitting nudity points to a channel, which will drastically restrict a channel's available advertising opportunities according to Gallardo.

Gallardo said "porn is inevitable," however, and adult content purges like Tumblr's 2018 ban rarely turn out well for the services that enforce them. The Galaxis platform does not purport to solve the problem, but Gallardo and his team will apparently launch a sister company specializing in an adult content, which he said is comparable to OnlyFans with a streaming business model.

Galaxis is currently seeking funding to fuel its prospective Q1 2022 launch.

MORE: Amouranth Might Be Done Doing Hot Tub Streams on Twitch

Read 53 times
Login to post comments